Asymmetric-Warfare-And-Apple-Pie-18900

However it is a term far more readily heard in the media nowadays promulgated by the nations defense planners and employed fairly often in reference to the war on terrorism. Asymmetric warfare is basically the application of distinctive, inventive, and unconventional approaches with the intention to defeat a numerically and technologically superior enemy. It requires a lot of forms which includes combat and p... Asymmetric warfare is as alien to average 21st century Americans as the Martian landscape. But it is a term a lot more readily heard in the media these days promulgated by the nations defense planners and utilized really regularly in reference to the war on terrorism. Asymmetric warfare is merely the application of special, inventive, and unconventional techniques with the intention to defeat a numerically and technologically superior enemy. It takes many types such as combat and psychological warfare. The 9/11 attacks and bombing of the U.S.S Cole have been examples of applying this type of warfare as were the recent verbal assaults by Venezuelan and Iranian presidents upon the United States at the UN.  [http://thewarzhack.blogspot.com/ war z hack]  Though asymmetric warfare has its roots as far back as the Trojan Campaign in Ancient Greece and Hannibals assault on Rome, it was Americans that brought it to a fine art type, if not a pure science. Some have mentioned that asymmetric warfare is as American as apple pie. Very handful of military historians would dispute that the Continental Army of the Revolutionary War and the Army of Northern Virginia for the duration of the Civil War fostered types of asymmetric war at its ideal. The guerrillas Francis Marion (the Swamp Fox) and Daniel Morgan (hero of the Cow Pens) drove Common Cornwallis from South Carolina. On a considerably grander scale Common Washingtons victory at Trenton was a fine instance of this sort of warfare. So was Stonewall Jacksons Valley of Virginia Campaign and John Mosbys exploits in the course of the Civil War, not to mention Douglas MacArthurs island hopping campaign throughout Planet War II. A key element of the new Rumsfeld Doctrine embraces the notion of asymmetric warfare to such a higher degree that it is changing Americans worldwide defense posture on a radical basis. It is no secret that leading brass within the Pentagon and the Defense Secretary are locking horns over the problem on a very frequent basis, not to mention a horde of retired generals raising alarm bells. Our leaders tell us that asymmetric warfare is a new and unproven field of military endeavor employed by terrorist cells and terrorist nations bent on our destruction. That we dont fully recognize and grasp the nature of the Islamic fundamentalist thoughts -- and have never ever faced such a determined or fanatical foe. Somebody wants to inform that to the boys who served on these aircraft carriers in the South Pacific for the duration of World War II. Those Japanese kamikazes and kaitens have been just as committed to their Emperor as Islamic fundamentalists are to Allah. We could not stop these crazed Japanese prepared to sacrifice their lives in the name of their trigger and neither can we cease the devoted Islamic radicals bent on attacking our homeland.  [http://www.blackops2cheat.com/2012/09/black-ops-2-zombies/ black ops 2 zombies cheat]  The distinction nowadays is theres no Harry Truman at the helm.  [http://www.blackops2cheat.com/ ca hacks]  That basic farmer from Missouri knew the head of the octopus had to be crushed in order to quit the carnage becoming inflicted in the central and south pacific theaters of war. So he did --- really quickly and efficiently. And this begs the question. How extended are American leaders going to enable terrorist oriented nation-states to finance and use asymmetric warfare --- by way of their proxy organizations such as al-Qaeda --- against the United States and continue to divert attention from the a lot more important strategic problems at hand, such as the increasing Chinese threat? Some say it is a diversionary ploy made to shift the publics focus away from other pressing problems such the environment, trade concerns, job losses, and revenue stagnation. The Bush Administration desires us to think the war on terror is a multi-decade extended struggle requiring a hazardous redeployment of American defense sources away from cold war postures. U.S. leadership has an intimate understanding of asymmetric warfare. If it does not interdict the use of this lethal form of tactical warfare against Americas essential interest right away, making use of what ever signifies required at its disposal --- however ugly --- it will ultimately have a very negative effect on both the financial and military institutions of the nation and a profound influence on its political stability as properly. And perhaps thats what our enemies want right after all. And then the octopuses of the planet will consume that apple pie for desert.