My complaint about Steven w Krivit

He's sensitive a' and seemingly impervious - to criticism, and new trades show this. It is been said that a writer who edits their own work has a fool for an editor, and Krivit has shown that. His idea that theories determine phenomena, rather than the reverse. <br /><br />"The phenomenon you've seen is difficult, crazy stuff. We know of no system which could explain your results, so we have serious suspicions concerning the accuracy your statement. There is no place on your <br />results in modern theory, in order that they just cannot exist. You are certainly the victim of errors, hoaxers, or self-delusion. We do not need to submit your paper, and any attempts at replicating your results would be a waste of time. Your requests for capital [http://news.newenergytimes.net/ steven krivit] are misguided, and must be made down."aa <br /><br />At once Krivit was working together with the main scientists in-the field. Many of them will not talk with him anymore, because he twists what they say, extracting whatever he can say is wrong and offering that and emphasizing it, with an important exception: he is Mr. Kid Gloves when it comes to Widom-Larsen theory.aa I have been finding that he has reconfigured his site to make it difficult to locate criticism of W-L principle, and in recent strings -- under the title "Critique of Widom-Larsen theory" -- I have noted this. What he's granted, probably as it was printed under peer review or separately, he presents with a introduction.AWhat he accuses others of is what he's, himself, doing. <br /><br />This letter isn't a debate competition by which I convince one to trust me or vice-versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the reality about Steven t Krivit. Before I say something else, allow me to tell Steven that there is an issue here. A sizable, dangerous, uncompromising one. <br /><br />I'm no psychiatrist. Still, from the little I learn about psychiatry I could state that Steven seems to present most of the outward indications of Asperger's syndrome. I really do not say that to evaluate but only to place Steven's rapacious, inaniloquent strategies into perspective. He says that truth is merely a cultural construct. That is a silly thing to say. It's like saying the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions. <br /><br />Steven centers on feelings as opposed to facts. Certain, he tries to twist and distort details to justify his feelings, but that just goes to show that in my view, everybody should be aware of the real history of Steven's junta. Though his junta began as a faction of his frightening coven, it quickly morphed into Steven's primary mechanism for parlaying private and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire. <br /><br />The importance of this transformation is that the claim that without Steven's exceptional guidance, we are going to go nowhere is illusory. That fact might not be nice, but it is really a fact aside from our wishes on the problem. <br /><br />Steven is extremely nasty. Nevertheless, while the Buddha said, there has to be evil so that good can show its purity above it. I am sure when the Buddha lived in modern times, though, he'd also comment on how Steven's remonstrations might have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into unprincipled academicism. <br /><br />In spite of no further evidence than what I've previously offered I'd allegea'and no person on Earth can change my opiniona'that if we neglect to generate a sense of responsibility and maturity in those that make conditions much worse than can actually have been the case without his addlepated efforts then our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead kingdom. The "decay of that enormous wreck," as the poet Shelley puts it, shows us that all of the terrible things that are currently going on are a sign of Steven's unpleasant prAcis. They're not just a cause; they are an impact. We ought to cultivate and build a true spirit of community. To do anything else, and I really do mean anything else, is a total waste of time. <br /><br />Pertinacious pseudo-intellectuals encourage and exacerbate passivity in certain people who might otherwise be active and responsible individuals. That said, we ought to not lose sight of who the true enemy is: Steven b Krivit and his meretricious loyalists. One might conclude that his meandering and maundering comments certainly indicate that Steven hopes to influence the perceptions of dominant culture towards any environment or action that's generally slaphappy sometime soon. <br /><br />As an alternative, one may possibly conclude he offers simplistic answers to complex problems. In any case, you can find two sorts of people nowadays. There are those who stifle dissent, and there are those who address the legitimate rage, anxiety, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Steven since they saw no additional options for change. Steven fits nicely in to the former category, naturally. Sorry for babbling so much, but Steven w Krivit wants everyone to focus on his every idiosyncratic impulse. <br /><br />"Talent hits a target no-one else could hit; genius hits targets no-one <br />else can see." - SchopenhauerSteven Krivit Paid by Charles Entenmann & Widom- Larsen?