Sandy Berger Ruling Fair Or Not YildirimDelacruz

In fact, some would easily think that Sandy Berger got hard penalties because his negotia.. For all intents and purposes, justice was served when Sandy Berger was fined $50,000 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson in her ruling on September 8, 2005 regarding Sandy Bergers mis-handling of classified documents. More over, Sandy Berger may surrender his security clearance for three years following ruling. Judges Robinsons decision was graciously accepted by sandy Berger. The truth is, some would easily believe that Sandy Berger got firm charges because his negotiations with key prosecutor Noel Hillman and business concerned only $10,000 in fine. The penalties were compounded by his loss of security license. General, Judge Robinsons decision made the Republicans and the Democrats, the U.S Justice Department and the Sandy Berger camp, exceptionally happy and relieved. Some individuals both in the government and the private-sector, but, do not think that the ruling was honest at all. For these individuals, the charges levied upon erring former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was much like simple a hit on the wrist. For an error so grave, the good should have been stiffer and Sandy Berger should have been sent to prison. It was a criminal act in line with the law. The Sandy Berger camp got around saying that what Berger committed was a simple violation of-the National Archives regulations, however it was hardly a criminal act. Actually, however, what Berger did can easily be categorized as a of Section 793 of Title 18 of the U.S Code. Under this section, deliberate distribution of classified documents and materials is legal. Even accidental dissemination of or dropping classified supplies as a result of gross negligence under this code is punishable with a great and/or imprisonment of for the most part 10-years. It was a hard thing for Bergers critics to swallow that Sandy Berger got off so lightly when under this law, h-e could have been sentenced ten years. Even when no one could realistically expect Berger to be provided with the full maximum, critics still believed that Sandy Berger must have been fined AND charged for a period. Sandy Berger deliberately removed the papers. Initially, Sandy Berger wouldnt acknowledge to deliberately taking the files from the National Archives. He insisted, when he was asked by National Archives officials about missing documents, that he inadvertently shoved them in with his papers when he gathered his things into his account. These documents were promptly returned by him. But, after due investigation, it was found out that Berger took over those two copies. On a visit h-e actually took three more. This pictorial  [http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10668680.htm Sandy Chiropractor]  website has oodles of prodound tips for why to ponder this hypothesis. He later admitted to reducing these up when he admitted to get deliberately take-n the materials. Experts thought that even if they concede that Sandy Berger had no intention of distributing the sensitive information, they had no intention of conceding that Berger created an honest mistake. The very fact that he's a National Security Advisor means that he knew appropriate techniques and methods in regards to classified materials. Sandy Berger knew that however essential his interview with the 9/11 commission was, it was much more crucial to protect national security by after the National Archives laws about these files. The undeniable fact that Berger deliberately set himself above the law needs to have merited higher than a hit on the wrist but a wallop on the bottom.