Marriage equality

De BISAWiki

(Diferença entre revisões)
(Criou página com 'The New York Times published a transient report about the Defense of Marriage Act which was handed in 1996. The legislation claims the States do not have to give equivalent privi...')
 
Linha 1: Linha 1:
-
The New York Times published a transient report about the Defense of Marriage Act which was handed in 1996. The legislation claims the States do not have to give equivalent privileges to identical sexual intercourse couples, even if they married in a point out that marriage is lawful. President Obama is asking for Congress to repeal this law.
+
The New York Occasions released a short report about the Protection of Marriage Act which was handed in 1996. The regulation states the States do not have to give equivalent privileges to very same sex partners, even if they married in a point out that relationship is lawful. President Obama is inquiring for Congress to repeal this regulation.
-
How can one determine if a legislation is a violation of human legal rights? What does human legal rights imply, and is Prop 8 of California a violation of a person's standard human rights? Correct now the Point out of California demands to solution this concern in order for Proposition 8 to be overturned.
+
How can a single determine if a regulation is a violation of human rights? What does human rights imply, and is Prop eight of California a violation of a person's fundamental human legal rights? Correct now the State of California demands to answer this query in purchase for Proposition 8 to be overturned.
-
The California Condition Supreme Courtroom has read arguments in the scenario of Homosexual Relationship for equally sides and determined to not over change this new legislation, but made the decision to not overturn over 18000 marriages done in the point out.
+
The California Condition Supreme Court has read arguments in the situation of Gay Marriage for both sides and made a decision to not over switch this new law, but made a decision to not overturn over 18000 marriages done in the point out.
-
But people who support Gay Marriage are not nevertheless silenced by this ruling. In reality, they maintain robust to their convictions and are nonetheless pushing for a new vote on the concern which could overturn the previous vote.
+
But people who assistance Gay Relationship are not nevertheless silenced by this ruling. In fact, they hold sturdy to their convictions and are still pushing for a new vote on the issue which could overturn the earlier vote.
-
Those that declare the discussion is not a spiritual 1 are not spending consideration to the current debates heading on in our country. Pageant contestant Carrie Prejean has been in the location gentle, and has been, given that her infamous comments at the Miss United states Pageant regarding her look at on Homosexual Relationship. She has said that God did not intend for a guy to marry another gentleman, that it goes against her beliefs as a Christian to assistance Gay Relationship. That is naturally a religion viewpoint on the issue.
+
Those that claim the discussion is not a spiritual a single are not having to pay focus to the present debates going on in our nation. Pageant contestant Carrie Prejean has been in the spot mild, and has been, given that her infamous responses at the Miss out on Usa Pageant concerning her view on Homosexual Marriage. She has stated that God did not intend for a gentleman to marry another guy, that it goes from her beliefs as a Christian to assist Homosexual Marriage. That is clearly a religion point of view on the issue.
-
I created this argument just before, and I make it once more. The price we location on this word "relationship" is considerably too powerful. Homosexuality is not something new to the twenty first Century, but People in america proceed to behave as if it is. The subject matter of Homosexual Marriage is dear to numerous folks for very different causes depending on which aspect of the isle they stand on. This topic is extremely sensitive to so several individuals.
+
I manufactured this argument before, and I make it yet again. The value we spot on this word "relationship" is much way too potent. Homosexuality is not some thing new to the twenty first Century, but Americans proceed to behave as if it is. The topic of Gay Marriage is pricey to numerous men and women for very various motives dependent on which aspect of the isle they stand on. This topic is quite delicate to so many people.
-
Get a minute and search at the aspect of why Gay Relationship is so critical. The US has truly been shifting in a course of restricting identical sexual intercourse couples as even becoming couples. They don't have the easy proper to go to their cherished one particular if the other is ill in a medical center. The hospital has the correct to say no.
+
Just take a moment and search at the side of why Homosexual Marriage is so important. The US has truly been relocating in a path of limiting identical sex couples as even being couples. They do not have the simple appropriate to pay a visit to their liked 1 if the other is unwell in a medical center. The hospital has the correct to say no.
-
The US sees itself as a progressive society, we have been moving away from producing law the restrict other folks. Especially, segregation. The concept of independent, but equivalent was completed away with due to the fact folks opened their eyes and understood that it was not equivalent. Whites, at that time, did not search as African People in america as equal citizens, and in numerous states and nations around the world they nonetheless will not. But the coronary heart of Brown v. Board of Education and learning was to attempt and create a culture were we enrich every single other and find out collectively so every person can have the identical simple rights.
+
The US sees itself as a progressive society, we have been relocating away from creating law the restrict other men and women. Especially, segregation. The idea of separate, but equivalent was accomplished absent with due to the fact folks opened their eyes and realized that it was not equal. Whites, at that time, did not appear as African Individuals as equal citizens, and in a lot of states and international locations they still will not. But the coronary heart of Brown v. Board of Schooling was to try out and create a society had been we enrich each other and learn collectively so everyone can have the very same standard rights.
-
We are clearly even now operating on equality, not only with African People in america, but now we have introduced a new group of men and women into the combine. The notion of a Civil Union vs. Marriage is essentially like the "individual, but equal" issue during the civil legal rights movement. Its fully independent and not at all equivalent.
+
We are obviously nonetheless working on equality, not only with African People in america, but now we have introduced a new team of individuals into the combine. The concept of a Civil Union vs. Relationship is fundamentally like the "separate, but equal" concern during the civil rights movement. Its totally individual and not at all equivalent.
-
Many argue that relationship was meant for procreation, which is why they are against Homosexual Marriage. But marriage of the 21st Century is no lengthier about procreation, many partners chose not to marry, but have children, or folks chose to marry and in no way have young children. Need to people folks not be permitted to get married since their union contradicts the definition of marriage?
+
Several argue that marriage was meant for procreation, which is why they are from Homosexual Marriage. But relationship of the 21st Century is no more time about procreation, numerous partners chose not to marry, but have youngsters, or people chose to marry and never have youngsters. Need to these folks not be permitted to get married simply because their union contradicts the definition of marriage?
-
Individuals will not usually feel about the heritage of relationship, but not prolonged in the past, and this even now continues in a lot of nations around the world, folks have been not permitted to selected their companions. Their marriages have been arranged. Love was in no way a portion of their choice method, purely the probability of generating youngsters. But nowadays, we have option now in who we can marry, and we have decision in regardless of whether we want to stay married to that particular person.
+
Men and women don't constantly think about the historical past of relationship, but not prolonged in the past, and this even now continues in numerous international locations, folks ended up not permitted to selected their partners. Their marriages ended up arranged. Really like was never ever a part of their choice method, purely the likelihood of producing children. But right now, we have choice now in who we can marry, and we have decision in whether we want to stay married to that person.
-
Legal guidelines are meant to be produced to shield folks, not exclude them. Who are we guarding when culture states two folks who really like every single other can't get married, that Homosexual Relationship need to be illegal? Who are we protecting when we say they can have civil unions vs. marriage? Why?
+
Rules are intended to be designed to safeguard people, not exclude them. Who are we protecting when society says two men and women who enjoy each other cannot get married, that Gay Marriage should be illegal? Who are we guarding when we say they can have civil unions vs. marriage? Why?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA
<br>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA marriage equality]
<br>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA marriage equality]
-
<br>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA learn more at our site]
+
<br>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA check out our site]

Edição atual tal como 02h28min de 4 de abril de 2013

The New York Occasions released a short report about the Protection of Marriage Act which was handed in 1996. The regulation states the States do not have to give equivalent privileges to very same sex partners, even if they married in a point out that relationship is lawful. President Obama is inquiring for Congress to repeal this regulation.

How can a single determine if a regulation is a violation of human rights? What does human rights imply, and is Prop eight of California a violation of a person's fundamental human legal rights? Correct now the State of California demands to answer this query in purchase for Proposition 8 to be overturned.

The California Condition Supreme Court has read arguments in the situation of Gay Marriage for both sides and made a decision to not over switch this new law, but made a decision to not overturn over 18000 marriages done in the point out.

But people who assistance Gay Relationship are not nevertheless silenced by this ruling. In fact, they hold sturdy to their convictions and are still pushing for a new vote on the issue which could overturn the earlier vote.

Those that claim the discussion is not a spiritual a single are not having to pay focus to the present debates going on in our nation. Pageant contestant Carrie Prejean has been in the spot mild, and has been, given that her infamous responses at the Miss out on Usa Pageant concerning her view on Homosexual Marriage. She has stated that God did not intend for a gentleman to marry another guy, that it goes from her beliefs as a Christian to assist Homosexual Marriage. That is clearly a religion point of view on the issue.

I manufactured this argument before, and I make it yet again. The value we spot on this word "relationship" is much way too potent. Homosexuality is not some thing new to the twenty first Century, but Americans proceed to behave as if it is. The topic of Gay Marriage is pricey to numerous men and women for very various motives dependent on which aspect of the isle they stand on. This topic is quite delicate to so many people.

Just take a moment and search at the side of why Homosexual Marriage is so important. The US has truly been relocating in a path of limiting identical sex couples as even being couples. They do not have the simple appropriate to pay a visit to their liked 1 if the other is unwell in a medical center. The hospital has the correct to say no.

The US sees itself as a progressive society, we have been relocating away from creating law the restrict other men and women. Especially, segregation. The idea of separate, but equivalent was accomplished absent with due to the fact folks opened their eyes and realized that it was not equal. Whites, at that time, did not appear as African Individuals as equal citizens, and in a lot of states and international locations they still will not. But the coronary heart of Brown v. Board of Schooling was to try out and create a society had been we enrich each other and learn collectively so everyone can have the very same standard rights.

We are obviously nonetheless working on equality, not only with African People in america, but now we have introduced a new team of individuals into the combine. The concept of a Civil Union vs. Relationship is fundamentally like the "separate, but equal" concern during the civil rights movement. Its totally individual and not at all equivalent.

Several argue that marriage was meant for procreation, which is why they are from Homosexual Marriage. But relationship of the 21st Century is no more time about procreation, numerous partners chose not to marry, but have youngsters, or people chose to marry and never have youngsters. Need to these folks not be permitted to get married simply because their union contradicts the definition of marriage?

Men and women don't constantly think about the historical past of relationship, but not prolonged in the past, and this even now continues in numerous international locations, folks ended up not permitted to selected their partners. Their marriages ended up arranged. Really like was never ever a part of their choice method, purely the likelihood of producing children. But right now, we have choice now in who we can marry, and we have decision in whether we want to stay married to that person.

Rules are intended to be designed to safeguard people, not exclude them. Who are we protecting when society says two men and women who enjoy each other cannot get married, that Gay Marriage should be illegal? Who are we guarding when we say they can have civil unions vs. marriage? Why?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCYB7fHS5rA
marriage equality
check out our site

Obtida de "http://wiki.bisaweb.com.br/index.php/Marriage_equality"
Ferramentas pessoais