Caricatures-
De BISAWiki
| Linha 1: | Linha 1: | ||
== [http://www.aaacaricatures.com caricatures] == | == [http://www.aaacaricatures.com caricatures] == | ||
| - | There are efforts to | + | There are efforts to supply caricatures automatically or semi-automatically using tricks techniques. for example, a system projected by Akleman et al.[13] provides distortion tools specifically designed toward speedily manufacturing caricatures. There area unit only a few computer code programs designed specifically for automatically making caricatures. |
| - | Computer graphic system | + | Computer graphic system needs quite completely different talent sets to style a caricature as compared to the caricatures created on paper. thus employing a computer in the digital production of caricatures needs advanced knowledge of the program's practicality. rather than being an easier methodology of caricature creation, it can be a more advanced methodology of creating pictures that feature finer coloring textures than are often created victimization more ancient methods. |
| - | [http://www.aaacaricatures.com caricatures] A milestone in formally | + | [http://www.aaacaricatures.com caricatures] A milestone in formally process caricature was Susan Brennan's master's thesis[14] in 1982. In her system, caricature was formalized because the process of exaggerating differences from a mean face. for instance, if Prince of Wales has more distinguished ears than the common person, in his caricature the ears are abundant larger than traditional. Brennan's system enforced this idea in a very partially automatic fashion as follows: the operator was needed to input a frontal drawing of the required person having a consistent topology (the range and ordering of lines for each face). She obtained a corresponding drawing of a mean male face. Then, the actual face was caricatured just by subtracting from the particular face the corresponding purpose on the mean face (the origin being placed in the middle of the face), scaling this difference by a factor larger than one, and adding the scaled difference back onto the mean face. |
| - | Though Brennan's systematisation was introduced within the Eighties, it remains relevant in recent work. Mo et al.[15] refined the idea by noting that the population variance of the feature should be taken into account. For example, the distance between the eyes varies less than other features such as the size of the nose. Thus even a small variation in the eye spacing is unusual and should be exaggerated, whereas a correspondingly small change in the nose size relative to the mean would not be unusual enough to be worthy of exaggeration. | + | Though Brennan's systematisation was introduced within the Nineteen Eighties, it remains relevant in recent work. Mo et al.[15] refined the idea by noting that the population variance of the feature should be taken into account. For example, the distance between the eyes varies less than other features such as the size of the nose. Thus even a small variation in the eye spacing is unusual and should be exaggerated, whereas a correspondingly small change in the nose size relative to the mean would not be unusual enough to be worthy of exaggeration. |
Edição de 18h44min de 1 de setembro de 2013
caricatures
There are efforts to supply caricatures automatically or semi-automatically using tricks techniques. for example, a system projected by Akleman et al.[13] provides distortion tools specifically designed toward speedily manufacturing caricatures. There area unit only a few computer code programs designed specifically for automatically making caricatures.
Computer graphic system needs quite completely different talent sets to style a caricature as compared to the caricatures created on paper. thus employing a computer in the digital production of caricatures needs advanced knowledge of the program's practicality. rather than being an easier methodology of caricature creation, it can be a more advanced methodology of creating pictures that feature finer coloring textures than are often created victimization more ancient methods.
caricatures A milestone in formally process caricature was Susan Brennan's master's thesis[14] in 1982. In her system, caricature was formalized because the process of exaggerating differences from a mean face. for instance, if Prince of Wales has more distinguished ears than the common person, in his caricature the ears are abundant larger than traditional. Brennan's system enforced this idea in a very partially automatic fashion as follows: the operator was needed to input a frontal drawing of the required person having a consistent topology (the range and ordering of lines for each face). She obtained a corresponding drawing of a mean male face. Then, the actual face was caricatured just by subtracting from the particular face the corresponding purpose on the mean face (the origin being placed in the middle of the face), scaling this difference by a factor larger than one, and adding the scaled difference back onto the mean face.
Though Brennan's systematisation was introduced within the Nineteen Eighties, it remains relevant in recent work. Mo et al.[15] refined the idea by noting that the population variance of the feature should be taken into account. For example, the distance between the eyes varies less than other features such as the size of the nose. Thus even a small variation in the eye spacing is unusual and should be exaggerated, whereas a correspondingly small change in the nose size relative to the mean would not be unusual enough to be worthy of exaggeration.
