The Business economics of On the internet Schooling

De BISAWiki

(Diferença entre revisões)
Myrtle573 (disc | contribs)
(Criou página com 'It becomes important to raise the question, as more and more universities are opening up to the idea of online proposition: "Can on the internet-education and learning be a susta...')
Edição posterior →

Edição de 21h13min de 30 de janeiro de 2015

It becomes important to raise the question, as more and more universities are opening up to the idea of online proposition: "Can on the internet-education and learning be a sustainable and profitable business? " To answer this query, we will investigate the various essential elements of this design which could choose the feasibility and economic sustenance in the e-thought. Some key guidelines that need considering are the demand, capability to source, delivery and technology method. Web Address

The need for the service is abundant as previously discussed so will be the accessibility to industry participants who could focus on this expanding need. Consequently, the viability from the task sits solely around the concerns of efficiently giving the help and selecting or quite developing a proper business structure. It is essential to examine these aspects to evaluate the business economics of the idea:

-Internet university compared to. standard university (in transformation)

-Promoting commodity versus. promoting experience

-Technology: costs and availability

-Procedure for providing differentiation and quality

-Price analysis: Original vs. marginal

Internet University or college or. Standard School

There might be two distinct models of the online education and learning: an online on the internet design along with an present college broadening its conventional design to fit the web proposal. Equally designs have distinct business economics. A virtual design starts off from the beginning and has no prior experience with a conventional training design; it readies curricula both itself or along with a pre-existing educative institution; furthermore, it has reduced structure costs but concurrently no marketing support.

What matters are the quality of content and the process of delivery, although it is relatively easy to start this business. For common modules or programs, this seems to be a great venture because the content would not really hard or costly to generate or disperse. Care needs to be taken to ensure the target segment for the program is carefully identified, as this model is not only competing with traditional models but also with online propositions of existing reputed educational institutions.

On the reverse side would be the existing universities that could be increasing their services to e-understanding. These do experience a challenge of following a business product which may not be suitable for their current undertaking. You will find a probability of cannibalizing their existing effective enterprise model. If to be continued simultaneously, need to be targeting reasonably different markets, both models.

This model has an advantage more than a new online setup regarding currently readily available information and current and productive brand; thus the establishment could demand reduced. The design fails to need huge expenses as the content is available, and merely must be digitized; also, it is reasonably quicker to generate need for the task, driving on the back of the current traditional version. The institution still needs to work towards differentiating the model, not by the content but by the process of delivery.

Selling Investment or. Marketing Encounter

The organization could very well decide to sell ten thousand levels each year or could such as a quantity that may be far lower (i.e. < 200). The question is whether the institution is attempting to focus on the quality of the education and students or is merely happy with building the numbers and playing on cost. Online education does provide an opportunity to reach the masses with very low marginal costs but simultaneously could affect its reputation.

Though it is extremely hard to replicate the environment and experience of a traditional model, an attempt to get the program experience as close to the traditional experience would be considered a good differentiating factor. This experience would not stem from the content of the program as it is easily replicable, but from the content delivery process reaching the end user. Again, the type of module and the class of customer segment would decide upon the extent of the "experience" required to be instilled in the program.

Technology: Availability and Costs
The complete business idea of online education is dependent on technology. The base of this technology is the internet which is the fastest growing tool in terms of number of users. "It took 37 years for TV to reach 50 million homes and it took the web 4 years to do the same., according to Lance Secretan" Though the base technology (the internet) does not seem to be a constraint, the bandwidth available to support the online education is questionable. Technology such as streaming audio and video requires huge bandwidth which may not be a constraint for institutions but for end users.

In most countries, the internet is at a nascent stage. More importantly the bandwidth to support "virtual reality" is not available. Even in developed countries it would be very expensive to have interactive and synchronous video lectures or sessions.

Though the pace of technological advancements is increasingly fast, and thus the bandwidth problem would soon be resolved, it may still be expensive to have a model that provides a similar learning experience to a traditional model. Therefore, the educational institutions would need to strike a balance between the "experience" and the cost depending on their target market segment(s).

Delivering Quality and Differentiation
In order to differentiate itself from others, it would be essential for an institution to focus on the process of delivering value to the end users. Educational institutions, keeping in mind their target market(s) and the available technology, would have to decide on the extent to which they should replicate or rather extend the strengths and benefits of their existing traditional model, if any, to the online proposition.

Aspects such as how to hold online lectures or how to transfer digitalized case material or even how to structure the program to make it more effective, would need to be evaluated.
If the proposition is to sell the program as a commodity, it would be better to conduct it in an asynchronous fashion, focus on delivering standard requirements, and cut down costs rather than add a new "experience" to it. This excludes premium programs with higher fees. These ones would be targeting people who are willing to pay for the technology needed to get a real experience of learning.

Cost Analysis: Initial vs. Marginal
The costs associated with an online proposition are low when compared to the ones of a traditional model which requires much greater infrastructure. The profits would depend upon the economic rent that could be derived from the services offered. This economic rent could only be sustained in the long run if the institution has sufficiently differentiated itself from its competitors.

The online model also has very low marginal costs compared to the initial set-up expenses. Unlike a traditional model which is limited by the size of its buildings (physical infrastructure) or the number of its faculty members, the capacity of an online model can be stretched to a great extent. This would help reduce marginal costs until a further increase in users requires significant investments in technology upgrades.

Ferramentas pessoais