Usuário:MabHarty704

De BISAWiki

Edição feita às 04h38min de 3 de setembro de 2013 por MabHarty704 (disc | contribs)
(dif) ← Versão anterior | ver versão atual (dif) | Versão posterior → (dif)

Concrete resurfacers should be viewed as cosmetic finishes, not repair product. If your concrete floor design isn't structurally sound, you must not even take into account applying a resurfacer until the structural issues are self-addressed. What do I mean by "structural problems"? Well, the short answer would be that if it's like a structural downside, it probably is. Is there proof of heaving, wherever chunks of concrete have broken away, unsuccessful or lifted? If therefore, there's an underlying drawback that may probably require that section of the concrete, at the very least, to get replaced. Are there massive, deep cracks that run through the slab, or is the surface setting out to disintegrate into little items of sand or powder? These, too, describe serious problems that a resurfacer can only mask for a brief time.

But if you've got minor cracks or pits in your surface, resurfacing are often effective as long as you first repair the injury. See the way to Repair large Cracks in Concrete Floors and the way To Repair little Cracks in concrete foundation types for further information. detain mind that concrete resurfacers ar reliable solely to a depth of 3/8 inch to 1/2 in..

Concrete patcher referred to as Top'n Bond. it's similar characteristics to the resurfacer, but is thicker and desires to be trowel-finished to a most depth of 1/2 inch. you'll come through an equivalent impact by simply exploitation some resurfacer, but adding less water than mixed up. you want to make a combination that will sit on a trowel, not flow off of it.