The Business economics of Online Schooling

De BISAWiki

Edição feita às 20h46min de 30 de janeiro de 2015 por Myrtle573 (disc | contribs)
(dif) ← Versão anterior | ver versão atual (dif) | Versão posterior → (dif)

It becomes important to raise the question, as more and more universities are opening up to the idea of online proposition: "Can online-education be considered a sustainable and profitable enterprise? " To reply to this inquiry, allow us to explore the numerous crucial facets of this model which may choose the feasibility and financial sustenance from the e-thought. Some essential variables to be considered are the desire, capacity to provide, technology and delivery approach. Graduate School of Economics IPB University

The need for the services are numerous as previously discussed therefore will be the accessibility of market place gamers who could focus on this developing demand. For this reason, the viability of the proposal rests only around the troubles of successfully delivering the services and selecting or instead planning a suitable enterprise model. It is crucial to examine the subsequent factors to gauge the business economics in the strategy:

-Digital school or. conventional school (in transformation)

-Marketing commodity vs. selling encounter

-Modern technology: costs and availability

-Process of delivering quality and differentiation

-Charge analysis: Original or. marginal

Digital School vs. Conventional College

There may be two different models of your online education: an online on the internet design along with an present university broadening its traditional design to fit the web based undertaking. Equally designs have distinct business economics. A virtual version starts completely from scratch and contains no preceding knowledge of a conventional schooling product; it readies curricula either by itself or jointly with a preexisting instructional establishment; it also has lower infrastructure expenditures but at the same time no marketing and branding assistance.

What matters are the quality of content and the process of delivery, although it is relatively easy to start this business. For standard components or programs, this appears to be a good enterprise since the articles would stop being difficult or costly to create or deliver. Care needs to be taken to ensure the target segment for the program is carefully identified, as this model is not only competing with traditional models but also with online propositions of existing reputed educational institutions.

On the reverse side will be the pre-existing colleges that would be stretching their providers to e-discovering. These do deal with a challenge of implementing an enterprise product which is probably not appropriate for their current task. There exists a probability of cannibalizing their current effective business design. Both models, if to be continued simultaneously, need to be targeting reasonably different markets.

This version comes with an side across a new digital set up regarding previously available information and current and profitable brand name; as a result the establishment could demand a premium. The model does not call for huge costs because the content is offered, and only must be digitized; it is also fairly quicker to create demand for the proposition, biking on the rear of the existing traditional product. However, the institution still needs to work towards differentiating the model, not by the content but by the process of delivery.

Offering Asset compared to. Marketing Expertise

The institution may possibly decide to market 10,000 degrees per year or may just like a variety that is reduced (i.e. < 200). The question is whether the institution is attempting to focus on the quality of the education and students or is merely happy with building the numbers and playing on cost. Online education does provide an opportunity to reach the masses with very low marginal costs but simultaneously could affect its reputation.

Though it is extremely hard to replicate the environment and experience of a traditional model, an attempt to get the program experience as close to the traditional experience would be considered a good differentiating factor. This experience would not stem from the content of the program as it is easily replicable, but from the content delivery process reaching the end user. Again, the type of module and the class of customer segment would decide upon the extent of the "experience" required to be instilled in the program.

Technology: Availability and Costs
The complete business idea of online education is dependent on technology. The base of this technology is the internet which is the fastest growing tool in terms of number of users. According to Lance Secretan, "It took 37 years for TV to reach 50 million homes and it took the web 4 years to do the same." Though the base technology (the internet) does not seem to be a constraint, the bandwidth available to support the online education is questionable. Technology such as streaming audio and video requires huge bandwidth which may not be a constraint for institutions but for end users.

In most countries, the internet is at a nascent stage. More importantly the bandwidth to support "virtual reality" is not available. Even in developed countries it would be very expensive to have interactive and synchronous video lectures or sessions.

Though the pace of technological advancements is increasingly fast, and thus the bandwidth problem would soon be resolved, it may still be expensive to have a model that provides a similar learning experience to a traditional model. Therefore, the educational institutions would need to strike a balance between the "experience" and the cost depending on their target market segment(s).

Delivering Quality and Differentiation
In order to differentiate itself from others, it would be essential for an institution to focus on the process of delivering value to the end users. Educational institutions, keeping in mind their target market(s) and the available technology, would have to decide on the extent to which they should replicate or rather extend the strengths and benefits of their existing traditional model, if any, to the online proposition.

Aspects such as how to hold online lectures or how to transfer digitalized case material or even how to structure the program to make it more effective, would need to be evaluated.
If the proposition is to sell the program as a commodity, it would be better to conduct it in an asynchronous fashion, focus on delivering standard requirements, and cut down costs rather than add a new "experience" to it. This excludes premium programs with higher fees. These ones would be targeting people who are willing to pay for the technology needed to get a real experience of learning.

Cost Analysis: Initial vs. Marginal
The costs associated with an online proposition are low when compared to the ones of a traditional model which requires much greater infrastructure. The profits would depend upon the economic rent that could be derived from the services offered. If the institution has sufficiently differentiated itself from its competitors, this economic rent could only be sustained in the long run.

The online model also has very low marginal costs compared to the initial set-up expenses. Unlike a traditional model which is limited by the size of its buildings (physical infrastructure) or the number of its faculty members, the capacity of an online model can be stretched to a great extent. This would help reduce marginal costs until a further increase in users requires significant investments in technology upgrades.

Ferramentas pessoais