Sandy-Berger-Ruling-Fair-Or-Not-39586

De BISAWiki

In fact, some would easily believe that Sandy Berger got firm charges because his negotia.. For all intents and purposes, justice was served when Sandy Berger was fined $50,000 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson in her judgment on September 8, 2005 regarding Sandy Bergers mis-handling of classified documents. Moreover, Sandy Berger may surrender his security clearance for 36 months after the ruling. Sandy Berger graciously approved Judges Robinsons decision. The truth is, some would easily believe that Sandy Berger got stiff fines because his discussions with main prosecutor Noel Hillman and company concerned only $10,000 in great. The penalties were compounded by his loss of security license. Over all, Judge Robinsons decision made both the Republicans and the Democrats, the U.S Justice Department and the Sandy Berger camp, exceptionally happy and relieved. A number of people both in the government and the private sector, but, do not believe the judgment was honest at all. For these individuals, the fines levied upon erring former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was comparable to pure a slap on the wrist. For one therefore grave, the good should have been steeper and Sandy Berger should have been sent to prison. It was a criminal act according to the law. The Sandy Berger camp got around saying that what Berger determined was a simple breach of the National Archives laws, however it was hardly a criminal act. In fact, however, what Berger did can easily be classified as a of Section 793 of Title 18 of the U.S Code. Under this section, deliberate distribution of classified documents and materials is criminal. For further information, people should gaze at: Sandy Chiropractor . Even random distribution of or losing classified components due to gross negligence under this rule is punishable with a fine and/or imprisonment of for the most part 10-years. It was a hard thing for Bergers authorities to take that Sandy Berger got off therefore lightly when under this law, h-e could have been sentenced 10 years. Even when nobody could reasonably expect Berger to be given the full maximum, critics still believed that Sandy Berger must have been fined AND imprisoned for a period. Sandy Berger deliberately removed the files. Initially, Sandy Berger wouldnt admit to intentionally taking the files from the National Archives. He insisted, when he was first asked by National Archives officers about missing documents, when he gathered his things into his collection that he accidentally shoved them in with his papers. H-e promptly came back these papers. However, after due investigation, it was found out that Berger took a lot more than these two copies. Over a prior visit h-e actually got three more. He later admitted to cutting these up when he admitted to possess deliberately take-n the classified materials. Authorities thought that even when they confess that Sandy Berger had no intention of disseminating the information, they'd no intention of conceding that Berger made an honest mistake. The fact that he's a National Security Advisor suggests that he knew correct techniques and methods as it pertains to classified materials. Sandy Berger knew that however critical his interview with the 9/11 commission was, it was much more essential to protect national security by following National Archives laws about these documents. The fact that Berger deliberately set himself above the law should have merited higher than a hit on the arm but a wallop on the butt.