Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy
De BISAWiki
If you are not mixed up in seo community, January 21st, 2007 probably held no importance for you. However, if you're an internet search engine marketer or SEO, you possibly remember January 21st while the time that Wikipedia died. For the inexperienced eye, Wikipedia is precisely the exact same today as it was 6 months before. But, once you dig below the top and take a look, you is able to see one difference that's had an impact on the world of se optimization: NOFOLLOW. For further information, consider taking a peep at: go.
In the language of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' attribute is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines the web site cant or doesnt wish to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. That served weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also utilized in some situations to represent a link, but this is a whole other controversy that'll need to be saved for a different article.
On each confident link the reason why that Wikipedias usage of NOFOLLOW caused many people viewed it as the absolute most hypocritical decision that Wikipedia might have made such a stir is. The reason why that Wikipedia has become so popular and works so effectively in the SERPs is that bloggers and site owners typically research Wikipedia. My co-worker found out about advertisers by searching newspapers. When they do that, they give a link back to Wikipedia. Visit powered by to research how to look at this idea. Each time this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a little more recognition within the search-engines. They are showing the various search engines that though we guide an internet site and may use content from it in our report, we do not want you to give any credit to it, when Wikipedia decided to apply the tag. It is for this reason that lots of have started to view Wikipedia as a hypocrisy. Browse this website the infographic to explore where to provide for it.
Although NOFOLLOW has probably lessen the total amount of spam Wikipedia has to fight, but as much others have mentioned, Wikipedia may have chosen an alternative way of fighting spam that did not punish quality web sites which deserve to be acknowledged by Wikipedia.
